Study 1 used the Chinese general social survey (2013) released by the National Survey Research Center at Renmin University of China to examine the relationship between altruistic punishment and social class. We selected two items as the dependent variables of Study 1 (D13: employees reported environmental pollution at their own cost; D23: employees retaliated against their foreign boss who insulted China). After screening the samples, a total of 4921 (for D13) and 4864 (for D23) valid data were obtained, respectively. Study 2 was a real-life event-based survey with 450 participants. In Study 2, we further investigated the relationship between social class and altruistic punishment under two forms (direct vs. indirect punishment). Study 3 was a 2 (social class: low/high) × 2 (punishment cost: low/high) between-participants design, and the main purpose was to demonstrate that punishment cost may play a moderating role in the process of how social class affects altruistic punishment. Based on the survey data, Study 4 proposed a conditional process model with belief in a just world as a mediating variable and punishment cost as a moderator variable, hereby providing a relatively complete explanatory framework for the impact of social class on altruistic punishment.
Study 1 showed that after controlling for educational level and annual income, participants’ subjective social class could significantly positively predict their altruistic punishment. Study 2 demonstrated that the above results hold in direct punishment, but not in indirect punishment. The results of Study 3 showed that when the punishment cost increases, punitive behavior decreases overall, but the downward trend is more pronounced for lower-class participants. The results of Study 4 further demonstrated that social class affects altruistic punishment indirectly mainly through belief in a just world when punishment cost is low, whereas social class directly affects altruistic punishment when punishment cost is high.
To sum up, we have found evidence that high social class (vs. low social class) individuals are more willing to engage in altruistic punishment in economic games and real-life contexts, implying that in an increasingly stratified modern society, people’s social background should not be ignored in the research of altruistic punishment. In addition, the results of this article also prove that on the one hand, altruistic punishment is at least partly a non-strategic sanction, because one force that drives people to punish is to protect their just belief, and on the other hand cost-benefit based considerations are not completely absent in altruistic punishment.
[V1] | 2022-07-06 17:27:12 | ChinaXiv:202207.00040V1 | Download |
1. 客体类别调节跨通道冲突感觉主导效应 | 2024-06-06 |
2. 融合中国诗词的线上自助正念干预的可行性及对参与者依从性的影响 | 2024-06-06 |
3. 为何人际价值观冲突难以达成共识?理论解释及调解策略 | 2024-06-06 |
4. 如何提高人类幸福感:个体、人际和社会的多层次机制 | 2024-06-06 |
5. 狄考文与晚清时期心理学的传播 ——从心灵学课程最早开设的学校谈起 | 2024-06-06 |
6. 数字在场与具身离场:身体—技术关系模式下MMORPG中的浪漫关系研究 | 2024-06-05 |
7. 路线难度和交互方式对行人寻路绩效的影响 | 2024-06-05 |
8. 将功补过!基于身份维护视角的家庭-工作冲突作用机制 | 2024-06-05 |
9. 健康焦虑的移动网络化解释偏向矫正:一项随机对照试验 | 2024-06-05 |
10. 物质成瘾者和行为成瘾者在纹状体和前额叶脑区激活的异同:基于任务类型的元分析研究 | 2024-06-05 |